Impact of PEEP on Respiratory Effort During Assisted Ventilation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

About this trial

Assisted mechanical ventilation is widely used to preserve diaphragmatic activity and improve lung aeration in patients with acute respiratory failure. However, during assisted ventilation, excessive inspiratory effort may develop and contribute to lung injury, diaphragmatic overload, and patient self-inflicted lung injury.

Optimizing ventilator settings to modulate respiratory effort therefore represents a major physiological and clinical challenge.

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key determinant of lung recruitment and respiratory system mechanics and may influence inspiratory effort by modifying lung volume, compliance, and respiratory drive. Despite its widespread use, PEEP titration in clinical practice is still mainly guided by oxygenation parameters, while its direct effects on inspiratory effort during assisted mechanical ventilation remain insufficiently characterized.

This physiological randomized crossover study aims to evaluate the effect of four predefined levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (0, 5, 10, and 15 cmH₂O) on the respiratory system and inspiratory effort in adult patients receiving assisted mechanical ventilation. Patients will be exposed to each PEEP level in randomized order, with stabilization and washout periods between conditions, while ventilatory support settings other than PEEP are kept constant.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age ≥18 years.

ICU patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (endotracheal tube or tracheostomy).

Ventilated in an assisted mode with spontaneous breathing

Clinically stable to undergo protocolized PEEP changes.

Disqualifiers

Contraindication to esophageal balloon placement (if applicable).

Significant hemodynamic instability or unstable vasopressor requirements.

Unstable arrhythmia or active myocardial ischemia.

Undrained pneumothorax or major air leak.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • PEEP Level Adjustment

Treatment groups

12 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Lead sponsor

Clínica Universidad de los Andes

Collaborator