About this trial
The two types of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT) might have their potential benefits and disadvantages. The proposed randomized clinical trial here will compare 'RA-TCRAT' with 'Nonrobotic TCRAT' procedures concerning effects on hospital stays, overall healthcare costs, safety, and feasibility. If the two TCRAT procedures are comparably effective and safe, the 'Nonrobotic TCRAT' procedure is probably preferred as it seems easier to use. However, if the 'Nonrobotic TCRAT' procedure is less effective and less safe than the "robotic TCRAT,' that procedure should be preferred.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Scheduled for any type of elective minimally invasive coronary revascularization surgery.
Using CPB.
General anesthesia is provided in an endotracheally intubated patient
Disqualifiers
Planned for coronary revascularization surgery without CPB;
Planned for a combined coronary revascularization surgery and a valve or intra-cardiac surgery;
LVEF less than 35%;
Preoperative cardiogenic shock;
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Nonrobotic TCRAT
- Robotic TCRAT
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
Mohamed R El Tahan
Lead sponsor
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Sponsor institution