Impact of Total Coronary Revascularization Via Left Anterior Thoracotomy (TCRAT) vs. Robotic-Assisted Harvesting of LIMA (ITcrats)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMohamed R El Tahan

About this trial

The two types of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT) might have their potential benefits and disadvantages. The proposed randomized clinical trial here will compare 'RA-TCRAT' with 'Nonrobotic TCRAT' procedures concerning effects on hospital stays, overall healthcare costs, safety, and feasibility. If the two TCRAT procedures are comparably effective and safe, the 'Nonrobotic TCRAT' procedure is probably preferred as it seems easier to use. However, if the 'Nonrobotic TCRAT' procedure is less effective and less safe than the "robotic TCRAT,' that procedure should be preferred.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Scheduled for any type of elective minimally invasive coronary revascularization surgery.

Using CPB.

General anesthesia is provided in an endotracheally intubated patient

Disqualifiers

Planned for coronary revascularization surgery without CPB;

Planned for a combined coronary revascularization surgery and a valve or intra-cardiac surgery;

LVEF less than 35%;

Preoperative cardiogenic shock;

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Nonrobotic TCRAT
  • Robotic TCRAT

Treatment groups

182 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Mohamed R El Tahan

Lead sponsor

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

Sponsor institution