About this trial
The healthcare sector contributes significantly to climate change. Reducing the number of patients receiving resource-intensive procedures such as surgery can lower carbon emissions, particularly when two treatments with comparable clinical outcomes are available. Nevertheless, the impact of incorporating environmental considerations into patients' decision-making processes remains underexplored. The investigators examine how including information about the environmental impact of treatment options in a gallstone decision aid affects patients' real-life choice between surgery and the more sustainable alternative of conservative treatment. Moreover, the investigators examine whether factors such as severity of symptoms moderate the relation between sustainability information and patients' treatment choice. An exploratory vignette study informed the hypotheses that will be tested among actual patients with gallstones making actual treatment decisions. The results of this ecologically valid study have implications for both clinical practice and healthcare policy by offering insight into the effectiveness of pathways to include patients in the transition towards sustainable healthcare.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Patients who were referred to three participating hospitals located across the Netherlands
Patients who received PatientPlus' gallstone decision aid in preparation for their surgical consultation
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Sustainability added to decision aid
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
University of Amsterdam
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborator
Leiden University Medical Center
Collaborator