Injectable Bioactive Composite vs Hall Technique for Proximal Cavities in Primary Molars

ConditionDental Caries

Trial statusNot yet recruiting

Trial phaseNot applicable

Trial typeInterventional

Biological sexAll

Age3-8

SponsorCairo University

About this trial

This randomized clinical trial compares the survival rate and clinical performance of injectable bioactive giomer composite restorations versus the Hall Technique for managing proximal carious lesions (ICDAS 3-4) in primary molars of children aged 3-8 years over a 12-month follow-up period.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

• Generally showing cooperative behaviour that could be managed by the operators.

Willing to sign the informed consent.

Accepts the follow-up period.

Moderate to low caries risk according to cariogram application

Disqualifiers

• Allergy to any restorative materials.

Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

Patients with debilitating systemic diseases.

Children with special needs.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

giomer
Other intervention
restoration of proximal cavities in primary molars using an injectable bioactive composite (Giomer) material. Cavities will be prepared following minimally invasive principles, isolated appropriately, and restored according to the manufacturer's instructions using adhesive bonding. Clinical performance will be evaluated in terms of retention, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, and overall restoration success during the follow-up period.
hall technique
Other intervention
the hall technique is a minimally invasive method used in paediatric dentistry to manage carious primary molars.it involves sealing the decay under e preformed stainless steel crown

Treatment groups

50 Participants

are divided into 2 treatment groups

Group A: Hall TechniqueActive comparator 1 intervention

Group B: Giomer RestorationExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

Restoration Survival Rate assessed by clinical and radiographic success/failure criteria (Innes et al., 2007)

Time frame

1- year

Secondary outcomes

FDI criteria biological

Biological properties: recurrent caries and adjacent mucosa

Time frame

1- year

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Cairo University

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: