Instructional Influence: How Cueing Alters Foam Rolling Outcomes

ConditionFoam Roller
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-64
SponsorUniversity of South Dakota

About this trial

Foam rolling (FR) is a common tool and procedure used in rehabilitation. Previous research has demonstrated physical improvements in range of motion and subjective reductions in pain post-intervention. Most of the literature theorizes potential biophysical reasons for these changes, but definitive studies are lacking. Another potential mechanism for these improvements may be psychological.

The purpose of this study is to explore the psychological changes that occur in response to the instructions given to the patient and how these may influence the outcomes the individual receives while undergoing FR.

Different instructions will be given for the same technique of FR to see if there are differences in changes with pain and range of motion.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Fluent in English and primary language

Disqualifiers

Current musculoskeletal injury of the lower limbs for which they are receiving medical care.

Recent surgery to the lower limbs that has not been fully released for full participation by a medical provider.

Use of any pain-relieving medications within the last 24 hours.

Any medical condition that limits their perception of pain.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Foam roller instructions for pain reduction

    Procedure/Surgery

    Foam rolling procedure with pain reduction instructions over hamstring muscle group

  • Foam rolling for range of motion improvement

    Procedure/Surgery

    Foam rolling over hamstring muscle group with range of motion improvement instructions.

Treatment groups

52 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ROMActive comparator 2 interventions
Group B: PainActive comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Straight leg raise Range of motion on dominate leg

Hamstring range of motion is measured with a standard goniometer on the dominant leg (the leg you would prefer to kick a ball with). Participant lying supine, the examiner assists with raising the leg straight (knee at 0 degrees extension) at the hip into flexion. Measure maximal hip flexion, with no change in knee extension, posterior pelvic tilt, or lumbar spine flexion. Goniometric measurements of hamstring length will then be measured with the stationary arm in line with the lateral midline of the pelvis, the axis of the goniometer will be placed on the greater trochanter of the hip, and the movement arm will be lined up with the midline of the lateral femur to the lateral epicondyle of the ipsilateral knee.

Time frame
from enrollment to the end of the session at 1 day
2

Pain pressure threshold of the hamstring muscle group

Use of a handheld algometer to assess pain pressure threshold. Application of pressure at the middle point of the hamstring on the dominant leg (the leg you would prefer to kick a ball with). The middle point is determined by the midway point measured from the ischial tuberosity and the knee joint line. Pressure is applied at a steady rate until the participant reports that the sensation of pressure changes from pressure to pain. Measurement in kg/cm2 will be recorded and the average of three measurements will be recorded.

Time frame
from enrollment to the end of the session at 1 day

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: