About this trial
The aim of the study is to assess the continued efficacy and safety of cochlear implantation in participants aged 5 years and above with Unilateral Hearing Loss (UHL)/Single Sided Deafness (SSD) supporting a change indication for use.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Previous experience with a current conventional treatment option for unilateral [SSD] HL (HA, bone-conduction device, or CROS technology), if no previous experience a minimum trial period of two weeks is required
English spoken as a primary language
Willing and able to provide written informed consent
Disqualifiers
Ossification, abnormal cochlear nerve or any other cochlear anomaly that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array
Previous cochlear implantation
Hearing loss of neural or central origin, including auditory neuropathy
Duration of profound sensorineural HL >10 years per self-report
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
The Cochlear™ Nucleus® Cochlear Implant (CI) System
DeviceThe Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI systems are designed to provide useful hearing. The system works by converting sound in the environment into electric pulses that stimulate the auditory nerve, allowing the brain to perceive sound. The Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI system has implanted and external components. Implanted component: The CI is surgically implanted under the skin behind the ear. It includes a receiver/stimulator to receive and decode the electrical signals from the sound processor and an electrode to deliver these signals to the cochlear. External components: The external components include a sound processor, and associated accessories and cables. The system is programmed by a Cochlear proprietary programming system, Custom Sound®.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in sentence in noise scores at 12 months post-activation in the binaural (CI and normal hearing (NH)) listening condition compared to preoperatively in the best listening (NH alone or NH and hearing aid) condition in 3 speaker configurations.
Measured with the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Sentence in Noise test (BKB-SIN). List of sentences are presented at 65 dBA with the level of noise varied stepwise at fixed signal to noise ratio to obtain a Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) where participants are able to repeat key words 50% of the time. Score range is not specified as metric is adaptive; lower scores indicate better performance. The 3 speaker configurations are: speech front/noise front; speech front/noise to NH ear; speech front/noise to poorer ear.
Number of procedure and device related adverse events classified by type, frequency and severity.
Secondary outcomes
Change in participant reported spatial hearing at 12 months post-activation compared to pre-operative ratings.
Assessed via Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) questionnaire (parent or participant version dependent on age). Rating ranges from 0 (no ability) to 10 (complete ability). Higher scores indicate greater perceived abilities.
Change in word recognition at 12 months post-activation in the CI alone condition compared to preoperative aided condition in the poorer hearing ear alone.
Measured via the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) Word Recognition Test. The score is the total number of words correct expressed as percent correct (range of 0-100); higher score is better.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Cochlear
Lead sponsor
NAMSA
Collaborator