About this trial
This prospective, randomized study included all patients who presented with primary hypospadias without chordee, Patients were randomized into two groups as group 1 or group 2,Group 1: Repaired with standard TIP repair as described by Snodgrass Group 2: Repaired with TIP with GIP using preputial graft. In both groups the functional outcomes were primarily compared regarding meatal position, shape, and the functional outcomes of the neourethra, in addition to other complications such as UCF, wound complications, cosmetic results and the need for a second surgery.
the investigators aimed to investigate whether GIP with TIP repair is superior to TIP, as described by Snodgrass in different types of UP and to provide an overview of the technical aspects of current TIP repair practices.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Primary hypospadias candidates for one-stage repair
Uncircumcised cases
Pediatric age group
Patients with regular follow up
Disqualifiers
The presence of chordee or urethral anomalies requiring division of the urethral plate or staged repair
Small glans < 11mm
glanular hypospadias
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Repaired with standard TIP repair as described by Snodgrass
- Repaired with TIP with GIP using preputial graft
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
Mohammad Daboos
Lead sponsor
Al-Azhar University
Sponsor institution