Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Modified Burch Colposuspension

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorAl-Azhar University

About this trial

This study aims to compare the success rate and complications following laparoscopic standard Burch colposuspension and laparoscopic modified Burch colposuspension (Transobturator tape like)

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Women with genuine stress urinary incontinence.

Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant stress element.

Refractory cases to conservative therapy or patients who are not willing to consider (further) conservative treatment.

Disqualifiers

Mixed incontinence with predominant Urge urinary incontinence.

Recent pelvic surgery (less than 3 months).

Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Previous surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension
  • Modefied Burch (TOT - like)

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators