Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine for Preperitoneal Infiltration Analgesia in Upper Abdominal Laparotomy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorQilu Hospital of Shandong University

About this trial

Upper abdominal open surgery is associated with significant trauma, and postoperative pain management poses considerable challenges. The inflammatory response triggered by peritoneal incision and the transmission of visceral pain via the vagus nerve are key components of "surgical stress" and pain. A potential intervention strategy involves the local administration of anesthetic agents to suppress peritoneal overreaction and block the cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokines in related nerves. Liposomal bupivacaine, as a long-acting local anesthetic, may provide more prolonged postoperative analgesia compared to ropivacaine. Therefore, this trial aims to prospectively compare the analgesic efficacy and anti-inflammatory effects of the two drugs when administered as pre-closure preperitoneal infiltration. Secondary endpoints include opioid consumption, complication rates, and postoperative recovery indicators, to comprehensively evaluate their clinical value.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Aged 18 to 75 years; for those >70 years old, a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score ≥80 is required.

Scheduled for elective upper abdominal laparotomy.

Surgical approach involving either a subcostal or midline incision.

Incision length between 15 and 30 cm.

Disqualifiers

ASA Physical Status Class greater than III.

Pre-existing chronic pain with long-term opioid use (for >1 year).

Known allergy or hypersensitivity to the investigational drug or any of its excipients.

Pregnancy or lactation

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Liposomal bupivacaine
  • ropivacaine

Treatment groups

146 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups