Maintenance rTMS for Depression (Maitr-De)
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorUniversity of California, San Diego
About this trial
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), yet substantial uncertainties persist regarding its efficacy as a maintenance treatment. This prospective study seeks to investigate the efficacy of maintenance rTMS in individuals with TRD who have previously responded to an acute course of rTMS. In the R61 phase of the study, we will recruit 75 participants across three study sites, the University of California San Diego, Weill Cornell Medicine, and Australian National University, into a double-blind, three-arm maintenance treatment trial. In this trial, participants will be randomized to receive either standard maintenance rTMS, clustered maintenance rTMS, or sham maintenance rTMS for a duration of 6 months. Our primary aim is to examine the efficacy of maintenance rTMS on sustaining connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) measured through concurrent TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) at baseline and every six weeks throughout the 6-month treatment period. We will also assess changes in depressive symptom severity using clinical scales, including the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as a secondary outcome measure. It is hypothesized that stimulation with clustered maintenance rTMS will demonstrate superiority in sustaining DLPFC-SGC connectivity compared with standard maintenance rTMS and sham maintenance rTMS
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
They met criteria for a DSM-5 diagnosis of a Major Depressive Episode (MDE) during the index episode of depression for which they have received an acute rTMS treatment course.
Meet criteria for either response or remission from their initial depressive illness. The MINI assessment timeline will be adjusted to allow scoring of illness symptoms prior to rTMS response. Response to acute course of treatment is defined as either a MADRS score of <10, or a MADRS score of 10-19, plus evidence of having met response criteria on either the MADRS or another structured depression rating scale. The response is defined as a >50% reduction in the total score from the start to the end of treatment.
Their initial rTMS treatment course must have consisted of at least 15 rTMS treatment sessions.
People between the ages of 18 and 80 at the time of screening. A written statement from the referring physician will be required to confirm that the participant demonstrates the capacity to consent.
Disqualifiers
1. Pregnancy 2. History of or current psychotic disorder or depression with psychotic features 3. Severe borderline personality disorder based on clinical assessment. 4. Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability or Autism Spectrum Disorder 5. Current moderate or severe substance use disorder or demonstrating signs of acute substance withdrawal 6. Clinically significant suicidal ideation with plan 7. Any history of ECT (greater than 8 sessions) without a clinical meaningful response in the current episode.
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) - Standard maintenance rTMS:
DeviceIn this approach, patients who were treated with rTMS five days per week during their acute episode receive less frequent treatments during a taper period (for example treatment three days per week followed by two sessions per week) with a gradual transition into a maintenance schedule. For example, the maintenance schedule might begin with a single weekly session for one or two months and then the intensity is reduced to one session every two weeks (and possibly then one session every three or four weeks).
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) - Clustered maintenance rTMS:
DeviceClustered maintenance rTMS typically involves around 4 TMS sessions applied over 2 days, at 1-month intervals. Our team initially developed this approach based upon preclinical TMS studies (for example (Maeda et al. 2000)) suggesting that rTMS treatment effects may accumulate when applied over multiple sessions in a shorter period of time (Maeda et al. 2000).
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) -- Sham maintenance rTMS
DeviceSham treatment will be administered as either standard or clustered maintenance rTMS for 6 months period using a sham coil. The intervention target will be located via a Brainsight TMS Navigator (Brainsight, Montreal, Canada). For safety reasons, the individual TMS intensity will be limited to 130% of the individual resting motor threshold.
Treatment groups
75 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groupsGroup A: Clustered maintenance rTMSExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Standard maintenance rTMS:Active comparator 1 intervention
Group C: sham maintenance rTMSPlacebo comparator 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Aim: To evaluate the effects of two active rTMS maintenance treatments (i.e., standard and clustered) compared to sham maintenance rTMS on DLPFC-SGC connectivity.
Our primary aim is to examine the efficacy of maintenance rTMS on sustaining connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) measured through concurrent TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) at baseline and every six weeks throughout the 6-month treatment period
Time frame
6-monthsSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University of California, San Diego
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Collaborator
Source ClinicalTrials.gov