Mako Cementless TKA vs Mako Cemented TKA

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity College, London

About this trial

The overall aims of this prospective, randomised, single-blinded controlled trial are to compare functional, radiological and clinical outcomes in Mako robotic-arm assisted cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) versus Mako robotic-arm assisted cemented TKA.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patient has symptomatic knee osteoarthritis requiring primary TKA

Patient and surgeon are in agreement that TKA is the most appropriate treatment

Patient is fit for surgical intervention following review by surgeon and anaesthetist

Patient is over 18 years old at time of surgery

Disqualifiers

Patient is not suitable for routine primary TKA e.g. patient has ligament deficiency that requires a constrained prosthesis

Patient has bone loss that requires augmentation

Patient is not medically fit for surgical intervention

Patient requires revision surgery following previously failed correctional osteotomy or ipsilateral TKA

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Mako cementless TKA
  • Mako cemented TKA

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

University College, London

Lead sponsor

Stryker Nordic

Collaborator