MAPT Protocol: Fixation Versus Arthroplasty Surgical Treatments for Early Recovery After HIP Fracture (FASTER-HIP)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age60+
SponsorUniversity of Southern California

About this trial

This study is an intervention domain of the Musculoskeletal Adaptive Platform Trial. The primary goal of this pragmatic, randomized, open-label, comparative effectiveness trial is to evaluate if arthroplasty is superior to internal fixation when used to treat minimally displaced femoral neck fractures in older adults ≥60 years old. We hypothesize that arthroplasty will reduce death, preserve ambulation, increase days alive and out of hospital, and improve health status compared to internal fixation within 4 months and 12 months from randomization.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

60 years of age or older undergoing surgery due to a minimally displaced femoral neck fracture

The patient has a health condition affecting physical mobility.

Complete fracture of the femoral neck (AO/OTA 31B) confirmed with anteroposterior and lateral hip radiographs, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging.

Minimally displaced fracture that could be, in the judgment of the attending surgeon, managed with either arthroplasty or in situ internal fixation without reduction.

Disqualifiers

The patient is not clinically suitable for either compared treatment.

Expected injury survival of less than 12 months.

Terminal illness with expected survival of less than 12 months.

Incarceration.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Hip arthroplasty
  • Internal fixation

Treatment groups

600 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

University of Southern California

Lead sponsor

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Collaborator

McMaster University

Collaborator

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Collaborator

Evellere Group

Collaborator