MCNAIR Study: coMparative effeCtiveness of iN-person and teleheAlth cardIac Rehabilitation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of California, San Francisco

About this trial

Cardiac rehabilitation is a medically recommended program for patients with certain heart conditions. It includes exercise training, health education, and counseling. Unfortunately, many patients do not participate in cardiac rehabilitation. Some find it challenging to attend the in-person sessions. This study aims to compare two methods of delivering cardiac rehabilitation: in-person and through telehealth. The investigators want to know if the effects of these two programs are alike and if certain individuals benefit more from one program over the other.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age 18 or older

Eligible for cardiac rehabilitation

Diagnosis within 1 year prior to consent

Myocardial infarction

Disqualifiers

Unstable arrhythmias which may make unmonitored exercise unsafe (e.g., history of ventricular tachycardia not on medical therapy and without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator)

Unsafe for patient to participate in the opinion of the investigator

Hospice

Unable to consent for self

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • In-person cardiac rehabilitation
  • Telehealth cardiac rehabilitation

Treatment groups

516 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

University of California, San Francisco

Lead sponsor

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Collaborator

Mayo Clinic

Collaborator

University of Michigan

Collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

Collaborator

Johns Hopkins University

Collaborator