MDT-0123 Japan Study
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorMedtronic Spinal and Biologics
About this trial
The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of this investigational device with autologous iliac bone graft (ICBG) in patients who are deemed to require bone fusion through spinal fixation at two levels (ALIF or OLIF) due to disc degeneration or spinal deformity in the lumbosacral spine (L2-S1) for intervertebral support and correction with the aim of stabilizing the spine.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Image findings of symptomatic degenerative lesions from L2 to S1(MRI or myelography within 12 months prior to enrollment) and subjects who have been observed to have a neurological disorder by nerve root compression etc. as follows. A) Radiating pain in the lower limbs or buttocks, sensory disturbance, numbness, symptoms of weakness B) B. Nervous claudication
Subjects with degenerative disc disease with disc-derived low back pain, with or without leg pain, and the subject's medical history confirms disc degeneration [e.g., pain (symptoms of leg, back, or sciatic nerve distribution), functional deficits, and/or neurological defects)] and one or more of the following on image examination (e.g., CT, MRI, X-ray, etc.): A) Instability (defined as an angle of motion >greater than or equal to 5° and/or oscillation ≥4 mm, based on radiographs of anteroposterior flexion). B) Formation of osteophytes C) Decrease in the height of the intervertebral disc D) Thickening of ligamentous tissue E) Degeneration or herniation of the disc F) Degeneration of facet joints 3) Subjects with an ODI score of 35% or greater prior to the procedure. 4) Subjects with sufficiently mature skeletons. 5) Subjects who are 18 to 80 years of age or older at the time of surgery. 6) Subjects who has not responded to non-operative treatment (e.g., bed rest, physical therapy, medication, nerve block, manipulation, percutaneous electrical stimulation therapy (TENS)) for a period of 3 months. 7) Subjects who have received an adequate explanation of the details of this clinical trial and have given their written consent.
Disqualifiers
Has undergone previous spinal surgery at the intervertebral level in question or at an Intervertebral level (e.g., spinal fusion / spinal surgery other than spinal fusion). Furthermore, the history of discectomy and/or discectomy surgery is acceptable.
Subjects who cannot complete the implantation of the investigational device and the posterior fixation procedure in one procedure.
Those whose total rhBMP-2 implantation is expected to exceed 12 mg.
Subjects for whom use of an internal or external bone growth stimulator is planned.
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
MDT-0123
Combination productUse a combination of the MDT-0123 spine cage and the MDT-0123 kit.
ICBG
DeviceUse a combination of the MDT-0123 spine cage and ICBG
Treatment groups
140 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: MDT-0123Active comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Iliac bone graft (ICBG)Placebo comparator 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Primary endpoints of efficacy
Bone fusion status 12 months visit after index procedure The success rate of bone fusion at the 12-month visit after the index procedure will be evaluated. Imaging evaluations will be performed at baseline, after the index procedure (to discharge), at 3, 6, and 12 months (CT scan will be performed at baseline, 6, and 12 months only), and imaging evaluation for the primary efficacy endpoint will be performed by the core laboratory at the 12-month visit. Primary endpoints
Time frame
12 months2
Primary endpoints of safety
Incidence of Adverse Device Effects in both groups up to 12 months post index procedure. To evaluate the rate of subjects experiencing any adverse device effects in both groups that occurring up to 12-month visit after the index procedure.
Time frame
12monthsSecondary outcomes
1
Change in disc height at the 12-month visit compared to the measurements taken within 14 days after the index procedure.
The height of the intervertebral disc measured by x-ray in the standing position. The calculation method uses (anterior disc height + central disc height + posterior disc height) divided by the anteroposterior diameter of the vertebral body. Preoperative measurements are conducted to understand the subject's pathological condition. 2） Change of General health condition at follow-
Time frame
From 14 days after the index procedure to 12months2
Change of General health condition at follow-ups from baseline at 12months.
Medical Outcomes Study 36-ltem Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess the general health status of the subjects. The results of SF-36 can be summarized into two components: physical element summary (PCS) and mental element summary (MCS).
Time frame
From baseline to 12months3
Change of OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX (ODI) at follow-ups from baseline at month 12.
Using the ODI, calculate and evaluate each score for the 10 sections (pain intensity, self-care, raising the object, etc.)
Time frame
From baseline to 12Months4
Change of Lower back pain at follow-ups from baseline at 12months
The numerical rating scale (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)) used to evaluate lower back pain using a score of 0-10.
Time frame
From baseline to 12monthsSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: