About this trial
This prospective clinical study aims to compare the short-term effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of two surgical techniques used for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication (PLP), a mesh-free native tissue repair method, and the Transobturator Tape (TOT) procedure, a commonly used mesh-based mid-urethral sling technique. The study evaluates continence improvement, perioperative and postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction. The goal is to provide evidence on whether a mesh-free surgical option such as PLP can offer comparable outcomes to mesh-based TOT, particularly for patients seeking alternatives to synthetic materials.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant urge symptoms
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication (PLP)
- Transobturator Tape (TOT)
Treatment groups
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
Sponsors and collaborators
Mehmet Incebıyik
Lead sponsor
Harran University
Sponsor institution