Mesh-Free Versus Mesh-Based Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Comparison of Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication and Transobturator Tape

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-80
SponsorMehmet Incebıyik

About this trial

This prospective clinical study aims to compare the short-term effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of two surgical techniques used for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication (PLP), a mesh-free native tissue repair method, and the Transobturator Tape (TOT) procedure, a commonly used mesh-based mid-urethral sling technique. The study evaluates continence improvement, perioperative and postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction. The goal is to provide evidence on whether a mesh-free surgical option such as PLP can offer comparable outcomes to mesh-based TOT, particularly for patients seeking alternatives to synthetic materials.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant urge symptoms

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication (PLP)
  • Transobturator Tape (TOT)

Treatment groups

147 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

1

Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.

Harran University Research and Application HospitalRecruiting63300, Şanliurfa, HALİLİYETurkey (Türkiye)

Sponsors and collaborators

Mehmet Incebıyik

Lead sponsor

Harran University

Sponsor institution