Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age10-14
SponsorUniversity of Malaya

About this trial

The Twin Block appliance is a removable orthodontic appliance that is used to help correct a backward positioned lower jaw in growing children. This appliance works by guiding the lower jaw forward to a specific position over a certain period of time. After completing the treatment, patients often experience improvements in their appearance, such as an improved bite, a more balanced facial profile and improved lip posture.

The investigators' interest is to compare two types of Twin Block appliances; traditional (conventional) and 3D-printed, by examining several factors, including the amount of bacteria that stick to them, the surface roughness, and the overall effectiveness of each type.

Surface roughness refers to the texture of the appliance's surface, which could influence how much bacteria can accumulate. Rougher surfaces may trap more bacteria, potentially leading to oral health issues such as bad breath, tooth decay, and gum problems. The study will also assess the effectiveness of both the conventional and 3D-printed Twin Block appliances, focusing on factors like how well they perform in improving jaw position and achieving the desired treatment outcomes.

Additionally, the investigators want to assess how these appliances affect the quality of life related to oral health. Participants will answer questions about their experience to help understand how the type of appliance impacts their daily lives, comfort, and overall well-being during the course of treatment.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients with Class II Division 1 incisor relationship

Overjet of ≥ 7mm

Age range of children: 10-12 years in females, 12-14 years in males

All permanent incisors and molars erupted

Disqualifiers

Patients with craniofacial syndromes (example: cleft lip and palate)

Patients with previous history of orthodontic treatment

Patients with hyperdivergent facial type (MMPA > 40º)

Untreated gingival disease (e.g.: gingivitis, periodontitis)

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conventional TBA
  • 3D TBA

Treatment groups

32 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators