Monolithic Zirconia Full-Mouth Implant Supported Rehabilitation Behavior
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorImplantology Institute
About this trial
In patients that did a full mouth implant supported rehabilitation does Cad/Cam Monolithic Zirconia compared to Cad/Cam Zirconia Suprastructure (zirconium oxide (Yttrium - partially stabilized with tetragonal polycrystalline structure) veneered with feldspathic ceramic, has less post-insertion complications after at least 1-Year follow-up ?
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Maxilla and/or Mandible Implant full-mouth restoration
Monolithic ceramic or zirconia-feldspathic restoration
be at least 18 years of age;
present no systemic or local absolute contraindications for endosseous implant placement;
Disqualifiers
the presence of any systemic disease or condition that could compromise postoperative healing or osseointegration.
Not full mouth rehabilitation
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Dental Implant
- Monolithic Zirconia (MZ)
- Zirconia-Feldspathic (PVZ)
- Monolithic Zirconia (FCMZ)
Treatment groups
90 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov