Mulligan Mobilizations Versus Active Release Technique in Tension-type Headache.

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-45
SponsorRiphah International University

About this trial

Tension-type headaches, characterized by a dull, aching head pain, are one of the most prevalent forms of headache disorders worldwide. Although they are typically not associated with severe disability or neurological symptoms, they can significantly impact an individual's quality of life due to chronic pain and discomfort. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as manual therapy techniques, have gained prominence in headache management, offering potential relief and functional improvements for patients. This study aims to investigate the comparative effectiveness of two widely used manual therapy approaches, Mulligan mobilization and Active Release Technique (ART), in alleviating pain, reducing disability, and enhancing range of motion (ROM) in patients suffering from tension-type headaches. Understanding which technique offers superior outcomes is vital for optimizing headache management strategies.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Individuals aged 18-35 years.

Diagnosis of chronic tension-type headache according to the International Classification of --Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) criteria.

Baseline HDI from 10 and above, and NPRS score 3 and above.

No prior exposure to any of the two interventions (ART and Mulligan Mobilization).

Disqualifiers

All other types of headaches.

Individuals taking medications for headaches.

Serious neurological or medical conditions that could affect the study outcomes.

History of psychiatric disorders.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Mulligan mobilizations
  • Active Release Technique
  • Mulligan mobilizations with active release technique

Treatment groups

33 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups