About this trial
As the frequency of dental implants increases, the incidence of complications and peri-implant diseases also increases. Early diagnosis and treatment of the disease is important to prevent consequences up to implant loss. Non-surgical treatment is the recommended treatment in the first stage due to its shorter duration and low morbidity rate. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis provides clinical improvements such as reduced bleeding on probing (20-50%) and, in some cases, reduced pocket depth (≤ 1 mm). This study aims to clinically and radiographically compare two different mechanical treatments in patients with mild and moderate peri-implantitis.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adult patients (≥18 years old)
Systemically healthy (ASA class 1 and ASA class 2)
Full-mouth plaque scores ≤20%
Implant had been in function for more than 6 months
Disqualifiers
Mobile implant
Overhanging restorations that prevent access to the implant for clinical measurements
Unresolvable technical complications that can cause peri-implantitis
Presence of active periodontal disease
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Ultrasonic Carbon Tip
Procedure/SurgeryUsing Ultrasonic Carbon Tip for Non-surgical Peri-implantitis Treatment
Titanium Curette
Procedure/SurgeryUsing Titanium Curettes for for Non-surgical Peri-implantitis Treatment
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Periodontal depth decrease
Periodontal pocket depth (PD) decreasing baseline to 12th month
Secondary outcomes
marginal bone level changes
Marginal bone level changes will be calculated at standardized periapical radiography
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.