Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAesculap AG

About this trial

The aim of the study is to elucidate, if the colonization of bacteria is lower on the Novosyn® CHD suture compared to uncoated Polyglactin 910 suture, which will be assessed by the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI: A1 and A2). The results of this registry will generate further clinical evidence for the use and the benefit of a Chlorhexidine coated suture used to close the wound after an emergency or elective laparoscopic or laparotomy surgery. The benefit for individual patients lies in the early diagnosis of complications and in the optimized postoperative controls of a clinical study.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients undergoing an emergency or elective laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery.

Written informed consent

Age≥ 18 years

Not incapacitated patient

Disqualifiers

No exclusion criteria except patients with allergy or hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Novosyn® in emergency or elective laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery
  • Polyglactin 910 in emergency or elective laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery

Treatment groups

2,998 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Aesculap AG

Lead sponsor

B.Braun Surgical SA

Collaborator