Omitting Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma (Stage 3) and Major Pathological Response in the Index Lymph Node

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age16+
SponsorD.J. (Dirk) Grünhagen

About this trial

Rationale: The randomized trial NADINA has demonstrated that neoadjuvant treatment with nivolumab with ipilimumab improves event-free survival (EFS) in patients with macroscopic resectable stage III melanoma. In this study, therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) was standard of care, showing that patients achieving a major pathological response (MPR, i.e., ≤10% residual viable tumor bed) have an excellent outcome (EFS and Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS)). The PRADO trial indicated that the MPR definition can also be revealed from a surrogate lymph node response, the index lymph node (ILN), allowing sparing the extensive surgery in MPR patients. In these MPR patients the DMFS was 100% after 1 year and 98% after 2 years, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 95% after 1 year and 93% after 2 years. Given that TLND is associated with morbidity and has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and healthcare costs, this study aims to prospectively investigate the safety of omitting TLND in patients who have an MPR within the ILN after neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Objectives: To investigate whether TLND can be safely omitted in patients with macroscopic resectable stage III (B/C/D) melanoma achieving an MPR within the ILN upon neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab and nivolumab).

Study design: This study is a prospective, single-arm phase 2 nationwide multicenter trial.

Study population:

Inclusion criteria for study participants are as follows:

* Patients must be eligible for neoadjuvant treatment * Patients must have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of macroscopic resectable stage III melanoma (stage III B/C/D) with one or more macroscopic lymph node metastasis * The patient must have a measurable tumor burden that qualifies (according to clinical practice) for neoadjuvant therapy

Intervention: Omitting TLND in patients who achieve an MPR in the ILN following neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab.

Main study endpoints: The two coprimary endpoints are 2-year Local Recurrence Free Survival (LRFS) and 2-year DMFS.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients must be eligible for neoadjuvant treatment (ipilimumab and nivolumab)

Patients must be 16 years of age or older.

a palpable node, confirmed as melanoma by pathology; a non-palpable but enlarged lymph node according to RECISTv1.1 (at least 15 mm in short axis), confirmed as melanoma by pathology;

a PET scan positive lymph node of any size confirmed as melanoma by pathology;

Disqualifiers

Uveal/ocular or mucosal melanoma

WHO performance status of two or more

In-transit metastases only (without cytological or histological proven lymph node involvement)

Prior targeted therapy targeting BRAF and/or MEK for melanoma

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Omitting TLND
  • Index node procedure

Treatment groups

213 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group

Sponsors and collaborators

D.J. (Dirk) Grünhagen

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center

Sponsor institution