One-year Patency Comparison Between Radial Artery and No-touch Saphenous Vein Grafts in Women Undergoing Isolated CABG

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-75
SponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General Hospital

About this trial

The use of a graft from the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery has become the gold standard for the indication of coronary artery bypass grafting. However, choosing a graft for the second-best coronary artery, focusing on long-term patency, is still a challenge. The saphenous vein using the "no-touch" technique is an alternative to a radial artery graft, but there is little evidence, especially in women. This randomized clinical study aims to compare the patency of these grafts in the second-best coronary artery in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

Lack of the patient's written informed consent.

Presence of poorly controlled diabetes, with a glycated hemoglobin value >8 mg/dl.

Emergency or salvage surgery, where the intervention needs to be performed quickly due to the critical clinical condition of the patient.

Renal failure with glomerular filtration rate (creatinine clearance) <30 mL/min.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Coronary artery bypass graft

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Lead sponsor

Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia

Collaborator

Hospital Unimed João Pessoa

Collaborator

Hospital do Coração Alagoano Prof. Adib Jatene

Collaborator

Hospital Hernan Henriquez Aravena

Collaborator

Hospital Norte Paranaense

Collaborator