About this trial
The large hiatal hernia (LHH) now represents approximately 50% of laparoscopic antireflux surgical practice.
In a non-comparative retrospective study of 399 patients operated for LHH with onlay patch of a bioprosthetic absorbable (Gore® Bio-A® HH0710) mesh with a mean follow-up of 44 months, 16% had a symptomatic recurrence with 7,9% requiring reoperation, one patient had oesophageal stenosis. No comparative effectiveness data exist to date.
Hypothesis: the incidence of postoperative hiatus hernia would be reduced by the addition of biosynthetic absorbable mesh reinforcement to a standardized suture repair technique, as compared to laparoscopic repair without mesh, without increasing the risk of complications.
The main objective is to compare the radiologic recurrence rate at 2 years between standardized herniorrhaphy with onlay biosynthetic absorbable mesh repair versus standardized herniorrhaphy with no mesh in symptomatic LHH.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Patient undergoing laparoscopic primary repair for symptomatic LHH. LHH is defined as a hiatal hernia larger than 5 cm in axial length as diagnosed at barium series and/or CT-scan with contrast swallow and/or CT-scan with contrast injection with axial reconstruction.
Symptomatic hiatal hernia: heartburn and/or regurgitation and/or epigastric pain and/or dysphagia and/or anemia (if exclusion of other origin);
Patient aged ≥ 18 years;
Patient affiliated to a social security system or beneficiary of the same;
Disqualifiers
Patient undergoing reoperation for recurrent LHH repair;
Emergency presentation needing an operation in a delay <6 hours;
Asymptomatic hiatal hernia;
American anesthesiologist score >3;
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair