Osseodensification Versus Osteotome Internal Sinus Lifting in Delayed Implant Placement

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-40
SponsorAin Shams University

About this trial

The sinus lift technique through alveolar crest Osseodensification is conservative, minimally invasive, and minimally traumatic, utilizing hydropneumatic counterclockwise rotating instruments to lift the maxillary sinus floor without touching the Schneiderian membrane, thereby minimizing the risk of perforation. In contrast, the internal sinus lift technique utilizing osteotomes to raise the Schneiderian membrane eliminated hammering, making the technique more patient-friendly, with the placement of a graft biomaterial around the implant. The challenge in this technique was the availability of \> 5mm residual bone height preventing membrane perforation and low primary implant stability. Consequently, the investigator aims to compare the efficacy and clinical outcomes of Osseodensification and Osteotome internal sinus lifting after delayed implant placement by assessing bone gain and bone density around implants radiographically, the primary stability of the implants clinically, and patient satisfaction.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

1. Patient partially edentulous with maxillary posterior edentulous ridge after extraction of more than 4 months.

Disqualifiers

1. Smokers.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Osseodensification Internal Sinus Lift
  • Osteotome Internal Sinus Lift

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators