Osseous Resective Surgery Vs Conservative Surgery with or Without Papilla Preservation Technique

ConditionPeriodontitis
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorUniversity of Turin, Italy

About this trial

The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of either fibre retention osseous resective surgery (FibReORS) or conservative surgery with or without PPT in the treatment of deep residual pockets ≥ 6 mm in stage III-IV periodontitis patients after cause related therapy (step II) in terms of endpoints of therapy and other secondary outcomes at different time intervals (1, 3 and 5 years). Moreover, the study aims to evaluate the stability of the results obtained for the different surgical approaches over a 5 years follow-up period.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Diagnosis of stage III/IV periodontitis.

Completed steps I-II periodontal therapy at least 6 weeks before.

Full Mouth Plaque Score less than 15% at re-evaluation.

Full Mouth Bleeding Score less than 15% at re-evaluation.

Disqualifiers

Compromised general health which contraindicates the study procedures (ASA III-VI patients).

Systemic diseases/medications which could influence the outcome of the therapy (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, non-plaque-induced gingival diseases, antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin and sodium valproate), certain calcium channel-blocking drugs (e.g., nifedipine, verapamil, diltiazem, amlodipine, felodipine), immunoregulating drugs (e.g., ciclosporine), and high-dose oral contraceptives).

Pregnant or nursing women.

Presence of tooth mobility ≥ class 2.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Fiber retention osseous resective surgery
  • Papilla preservation flap
  • Widman flap procedure

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators