About this trial
Gynecologists frequently overestimate the benefits and safety of ovarian cancer screening. AI-supported discussions may help correct these misperceptions. This study tests whether an AI-guided conversation about the evidence on ovarian cancer screening can improve gynecologists' knowledge and reduce non-evidence-based screening recommendations, compared with a control AI discussion on ovarian cancer prevalence.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
gynecologists in outpatient care who provide ovarian cancer screening to asymptomatic, average-risk women (not guideline consistent)
Disqualifiers
gynecologists in inpatient care
gynecologist in outpatient care who do NOT provide ovarian cancer screening to asymptomatic, average-risk women (guideline consistent)
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- ChatGPT - Control
- ChatGPT - Evidence-Based Screening Discussion
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead sponsor
Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Collaborator
German Research Foundation
Collaborator