About this trial
Prostate biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer and is most commonly performed using either the transrectal or transperineal approach. Although both techniques offer acceptable diagnostic accuracy, the pain experienced during and after the procedure is an important factor influencing the choice of biopsy approach and overall patient comfort. Pain perception in prostate biopsy is multifactorial, depending on the biopsy route, the number of needle insertions, the local anesthesia protocol, and the innervation of the relevant anatomical structures. The aim of this prospective study is to compare anticipated (pre-procedural expected) and experienced (post-procedural actual) pain levels in patients undergoing transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy, using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Findings are expected to contribute to clinical decision-making regarding biopsy approach selection with a focus on patient comfort.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Male patients aged 18 years and older Patients with clinical indication for prostate biopsy (elevated serum prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level, abnormal digital rectal examination [DRE], and/or suspicious lesion on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging [mpMRI])
Patients undergoing prostate biopsy for the first time
Patients able to understand and complete the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain assessment
Patients who have provided written informed consent to participate in the study
Disqualifiers
Patients with a history of previous prostate biopsy
Patients with a previously confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer
Patients with active urinary tract infection or prostatitis at the time of biopsy
Patients with anorectal pathology that may interfere with the transrectal approach (e.g., anal stenosis, active hemorrhoidal disease, anal fissure, prior rectal surgery)
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Not listed