Patient Reported Experiences With Sparing External Oblique Fascia Vs Standard Inguinal Orchiectomy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexMale
Age18+
SponsorLoma Linda University

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference in patient-reported postoperative outcomes between two standard-of-care surgical techniques for radical orchiectomy (inguinal orchiectomy versus external oblique fascia sparing orchiectomy) for treatment of patients with suspected testicular malignancy. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does sparing the external oblique fascia during orchiectomy reduce pain after surgery? 2. Is there a difference in narcotic consumption after surgery? 3. Is there a difference in neuropathic pain after surgery? 4. Is there a difference in complications after surgery?

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Participants undergoing radical orchiectomy for suspected testicular malignancy

Testicular malignancy can be germ cell tumor or non germ cell tumors, including paratesticular tumors as long as a radical orchiectomy is planned

Participants over 18 years of age who can provide informed consent

Participants not currently using opiates for another reason

Disqualifiers

Clinical T4 disease

History of illicit substance abuse (including prior opioid abuse) except for marijuana

Participants who underwent chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to orchiectomy

Opioid use within 1 month of study enrollment

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Radical inguinal orchiectomy
  • Radical external oblique fascia sparing orchiectomy

Treatment groups

80 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators