Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid (Gengigel Teething) Versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate( Angelus) as Pulpotomy Agent in Vital Primary Molars

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age4-8
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid (Gengigel Teething) Versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate( Angelus) as Pulpotomy Agent in Vital Primary Molars.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Is there a difference in the clinical or radiographic success when using Hyaluronic acid (Gengigel Teething, Ricerfarma , Italy) versus mineral trioxide aggregate (Angelus, Londrina ,Brazil) in pulpotomy of carious primary molars in children?

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Restorable mandibular primary molars.

History of reversible pulpitis.

Absence of periapical or inter-radicular radiolucencies.

Absence of widening of periodontal ligaments (PDL) space.

Disqualifiers

With systemic disorders.

Physical or mental disabilities.

Unable to attend follow- up visits.

Refusal of Participation.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Hyaluronic acid pulpotomy
  • mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy

Treatment groups

34 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators