Gluma Compared With Bonding Agent for Post-operative Sensitivity Following Composite Restorations

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2, Phase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-45
SponsorBeenish Hassan

About this trial

* The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Gluma desensitizer in reducing post-operative sensitivity following composite restorations in posterior teeth. -Patients visiting OPD will be selected after fulfilment of inclusion criteria. Patients aged 18-45 meeting inclusion criteria and presenting with active primary class I carious lesions on vital molar teeth with ICDAS score 3 will be randomly assigned into two groups: -Group A: Patients will be provided with Gluma desensitizer, Universal Bonding agent and Composite restoration and -Group B: Patients will receive Universal bonding agent and Composite restoration. -The progress of treatment will be followed up immediately (baseline) and at regular follow up visits at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. * Post-operative sensitivity will be assessed using an air stimulus and rated on a numeric rating scale for post-operative sensitivity assessment ranging from 0 to 10.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age between 18-45 years.

Good oral hygiene.

Active primary class I carious lesions on vital molar teeth with ICDAS score 3

Patients complaining of sensitivity to air and osmotic stimulus.

Disqualifiers

Excessive tooth wear due to clenching or abnormal habits.

Traumatic occlusion.

Periodontal or gingival disease.

Patients using analgesics and/or anti-inflammatory medicine.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Drug/Agent: Gluma Desensitizer
  • Drug/Agent: No desensitizer (Control)

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Beenish Hassan

Lead sponsor

Margalla Institute of Health Sciences

Sponsor institution