About this trial
This protocol describes a randomized controlled feasibility vanguard study designed to investigate the implementation and effects of esophageal pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in patients with high body mass index (BMI) mechanically ventilated patients at the Edmonton Zone. The study will enroll 30 patients with body mass index (BMI) \>=30 kg/m2 who require invasive mechanical ventilation, randomizing them in a 1:1 ratio to receive either esophageal pressure-guided PEEP titration or standard care management. The primary objective focuses on establishing the feasibility of conducting a larger definitive trial, while secondary objectives examine differences in applied PEEP levels, respiratory mechanics, and clinical outcomes between groups. The intervention protocol targets end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure of 0-2 cmH2O.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age 18 years or older
Body mass index ≥30 kg/m²
Intubated and receiving passive mechanical ventilation
Within 24 hours of intubation
Disqualifiers
Known or suspected esophageal varices
Esophageal surgery within 3 months
Known esophageal stricture or perforation
Active upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Esophageal pressure-guided PEEP titration
Procedure/SurgeryPEEP titration guided by transpulmonary pressure measurements using esophageal manometry. Esophageal balloon catheter inserted within 4 hours of randomization, positioned at 35-40 cm depth with position verified by cardiac oscillations and occlusion test. PEEP titrated in 2 cmH2O increments targeting end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure 0-2 cmH2O, with option to target up to 8 cmH2O for severe hypoxemia (P/F \<200). Safety limits enforced: transpulmonary driving pressure \<15 cmH2O, end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure \<20 cmH2O. Measurements performed twice daily. Catheter removed at extubation or day 28.
Standard care PEEP management
Other interventionPEEP management per institutional standard practice without esophageal pressure monitoring. For patients meeting ARDS criteria, PEEP titrated using ARDSNet low PEEP/FiO2 table. For non-ARDS patients, PEEP titrated to optimize oxygenation while monitoring hemodynamic tolerance and respiratory mechanics per treating clinician judgment.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Feasibility of conducting a definitive trial (composite)
Composite feasibility assessment including: (1) Recruitment rate (patients enrolled per month, target 1-1.5/month); (2) Successful esophageal catheter placement rate in intervention arm; (3) Protocol adherence (percentage of scheduled transpulmonary pressure measurements completed, compliance with PEEP titration algorithm); (4) Data completeness for average PEEP over 7 days.
Secondary outcomes
Average PEEP
Key secondary endpoint. Mean positive end-expiratory pressure during mechanical ventilation
Driving Pressure
Difference in driving pressure between groups
Partial oxygen pressure over inspired oxygen fraction ratio
P/F ratio
Days alive and free of mechanical ventilation
Days alive and free of mechanical ventilation
Other outcomes
Catheter-related complications
Occurrence of esophageal catheter complications (perforation, bleeding)
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.