Bumetanide vs. Furosemide in Cirrhosis

ConditionCirrhosis
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 3
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorStacy Johnson

About this trial

Patients with cirrhosis are frequently hospitalized due to an acute decompensation of their liver disease including bleeding, jaundice, encephalopathy, and volume overload. Volume overload is associated with increased mortality from acute hypoxic respiratory failure, hemorrhage from esophageal varices, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Clinical practice guidelines describe sodium restriction and diuretics as first-line treatment, combined with regular body weight monitoring to assess response. In patients with suboptimal response to furosemide, alternative loop diuretics like torsemide or bumetanide may improve natriuresis. Bumetanide has a theoretic advantage over furosemide due to its more rapid and complete intestinal absorption, combined with a prolonged half-life in patients with hepatic dysfunction. In this pragmatic study, the aim is to compare the efficacy of diuresis with bumetanide versus furosemide among hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

History of liver cirrhosis

Clinician placed an order for bumetanide or furosemide in electronic health record within 24 hours of presentation to the hospital

Disqualifiers

Allergy to bumetanide or furosemide

Contraindication to diuretic administration (e.g. active bleeding, clinical suspicion of hepatorenal syndrome, hypotension)

Incarcerated or in custody of law enforcement

Diuretic ordered for purpose other than volume overload (e.g. hyperkalemia, continuation of home medication without clinical signs of volume overload)

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Bumetanide
  • Furosemide

Treatment groups

500 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Stacy Johnson

Lead sponsor

University of Utah

Sponsor institution