In this study we are aiming to compare the Erector Spinae Plane Block and the Deep Parasternal intercostal plane block as regard to their technique, application and outcome in order to describe the most suitable method for pediatric cardiac patients undergoing primary repair of septal defects
The primary outcome of this study will be the time of the first request for postoperative analgesics by FLACC pain scale more than 4 The secondary outcomes will be the total postoperative analgesic consumption, time for extubation, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, hemodynamic instability, onset of ambulation and any other complications on the first day after surgery
Participants will be enrolled in this double-blinded randomly allocated using computer-based randomization into three groups. Group 1 will receive bilateral deep parasternal intercostal plane block. Group 2 will receive bilateral erector spinae plane block. Group 3 will receive conventional analgesic regimen without having a regional block
Pediatric patients with acyanotic heart disease
Patients with septal defect undergoing primary repair
ASA Ⅰ and Ⅱ
Patient's guardian refusal of procedure or participation in the study.
Patients with hemodynamic instability
Preexisting infection at the block site
Allergy to local anesthetics