Comparative Effectiveness Study of Two Forms of Ketamine for Treatment-resistant Depression

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorThe George Institute

About this trial

The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two formulations of ketamine - Spravato® and racemic ketamine - in people with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The main questions it aims to answer are:

* How the two formulations compare in terms of their effectiveness in treating TRD. * How the two formulations compare in their acceptability to patients, safety, effects on patient quality of life and function, and cost effectiveness.

Participants will be randomised to receive either Spravato® or racemic ketamine treatment and asked to complete some questionnaires to assess the effects on mood, treatment acceptability, side effects, quality of life and function, and health economic outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adult with treatment-resistant depression (TRD: not responded adequately to at least two different antidepressants of adequate dose and duration) who has a current depressive episode (DSM 5)

Assessed and attested by clinic psychiatrist as appropriate to receive either racemic ketamine or Spravato® ketamine treatment for TRD

MADRS score of ≥20 at study baseline, assessed by certified study rater

Aged ≥18 years

Disqualifiers

Not able to give informed consent

Any physical or mental condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with study participation including outcome assessments

Any treatment with ketamine or Spravato® within 4 weeks prior to written informed consent for the research study

Patients who require an interpreter/translator for the clinic consent process, due to the infeasibility of obtaining an interpreter for research assessments, including self-rated scales

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Esketamine group
  • Racemic ketamine

Treatment groups

162 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

The George Institute

Lead sponsor

The University of New South Wales

Collaborator