The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of inhaled bronchodilators delivered via nebulizers vs. dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in symptomatic participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC ≤ 70%) and show significant air trapping (RV ≥ 120% of predicted).
The investigators hypothesize that, in patients with symptomatic COPD, therapy with a long-acting anti muscarinic agent/long-acting beta agonist (LAMA/LABA) combination administered by nebulizer will improve hyperinflation (increase in inspiratory capacity and reduction in residual volume) and reduce symptoms related to COPD to a greater extent than LAMA/LABA therapy given by a DPI.
The study aims to demonstrate the following:
1. Compare the values of inspiratory capacity (IC) and residual volume (RV) in patients receiving LAMA/LABA by DPI with those receiving LAMA/LABA by nebulizer 2. Compare patient reported outcomes (COPD Assessment Test (CAT score), Baseline/Transition Dyspnea Index (BDI/TDI) and the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in symptomatic patients with COPD receiving LAMA/LABA by DPI with those receiving LAMA/LABA by nebulizer
Age > 40 years
Either sex
Current smoker or past cigarette smoking history of > 10 pack-years
Symptoms of COPD (cough, sputum production, shortness of breath)
Diagnosis of asthma (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
Previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (heart rate > 110 bpm) or ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia) (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
Acute myocardial infarction within 12 weeks of patient study registration (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
Acute exacerbation of congestive heart failure (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine
Lead sponsor
Theravance Biopharma
Collaborator