Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Revision TJA
ConditionDislocation, Hip
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorRush University Medical Center
About this trial
The aim of this study is to the compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of a dual mobility bearing versus a single bearing design with the use of a large femoral head (36mm or 40mm). We hypothesize the use of dual-mobility components in revision THA will be associated with a lower dislocation rate in the first year following surgery.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Any patient older than 18 years of age scheduled for a revision THA, including revision of both components, conversion of a hip resurfacing to THA, conversion of a hemiarthroplasty to THA, and revision of single components which allow implantation of dual-mobility bearings. In addition, patients undergoing reimplantation of a total hip arthroplasty following a two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection will also be included. Only patients with an acetabular shell diameter capable of accommodating at least a 36mm femoral head will be included.
Disqualifiers
Less than 18 years of age, primary THA,
conversion of non-arthroplasty femoral neck fracture fixation to THA,
patients unwilling to participate.
patients where the surgeon makes the intraoperative decision to use a constrained liner will be excluded.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Dual Mobility Implant
- Conventional, single-bearing implant
Treatment groups
322 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Rush University Medical Center
Lead sponsor
Rothman Institute Orthopaedics
Collaborator
Keck School of Medicine of USC
Collaborator
NYU Langone Health
Collaborator
Source ClinicalTrials.gov