Intrathecal Versus Epidural Morphine for Post-Cesarean Analgesia

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorHospital Central do Funchal

About this trial

Cesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, making effective management of acute postoperative pain a key issue in obstetric anesthesiology. Post-cesarean analgesia should promote rapid maternal recovery, support newborn care, and consider the pharmacological implications for breastfeeding.

According to recent PROSPECT® guidelines from ESRA, neuraxial opioids play a central role in post-cesarean analgesia and are at least as effective as other techniques, such as continuous local anesthetic infusion. However, the optimal route of opioid administration remains unclear. While earlier studies favored epidural morphine, more recent evidence suggests that intrathecal morphine may provide superior analgesia. Due to limited and conflicting data, no definitive conclusion can be drawn. Given that epidural morphine remains standard practice at Hospital Central do Funchal, a randomized clinical trial is proposed to compare the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal versus epidural morphine after elective cesarean section.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section;

Age > 18 years;

Willingness to participate in the study, as demonstrated by signed informed consent.

Disqualifiers

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification > III;

Chronic kidney disease with a glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min;

Relevant drug allergies (particularly to protocol medications);

Opioid tolerance;

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Intrathecal Morphine
  • Epidural Morphine

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators