About this trial
Denosumab (Dmab) is a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, its withdrawal is associated with a rebound phenomenon associated with an unexpected increased risk of vertebral fractures. Defining the optimal strategy for Dmab withdrawal is critically needed. Investigator propose an open-label randomized superiority strategy trial to compare the 1-year lumbar densitometric efficacy of biomarkers-driven zoledronate (ZOL) infusion vs standardized ZOL treatment to mitigate rebound phenomenon.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Women with post-menopausal osteoporosis
And treated with denosumab for at least 2 years and reaching decision of denosumab withdrawal because of achieved therapeutic target defined as no fracture during treatment; no new risk factors; no BMD decrease > 0.03 g/cm² at the spine or hip;
And with a history of severe fracture or a femoral or lumbar T-score ≤ -2.5 prior denosumab initiation.
Disqualifiers
Dmab use for bone disease other than post-menopausal osteoporosis.
Uncontrolled endocrine diseases. Liver failure.
Use of medication affecting bone metabolism during the last year, including bisphosphonates, teriparatide, romosozumab, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, breast cancer hormonotherapy, glucocorticoids over 5 mg/day.
Contra-indication to bisphosphonates according to license recommendation including chronic kidney disease with GFR stage > or = G3b. Prior intolerance to zoledronic acid.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- a second infusion of ZOL when crosslaps levels reach 300 pg/mL
- a rescue second infusion at month-12 (standard traitment)