About this trial
This study tests whether a new educational curriculum can help high school students in construction career programs better understand how building design affects community health and environmental justice. The study compares two approaches: (1) a new "Community-Centered Design" curriculum that uses the Ecosystem Justice Translator (EJT) software tool, which helps students see connections between construction decisions, energy efficiency, nature exposure, and health outcomes in different neighborhoods; versus (2) the traditional construction career curriculum that focuses on technical skills. Students aged 14-18 enrolled in construction career programs will be randomly assigned to one of these two groups. Over 6 months, the intervention group will learn to use the EJT tool and apply environmental justice concepts to construction projects. Researchers will measure how well students understand connections between construction, environment, and health at the start, middle, and end of the program, and again 6 months later. The goal is to determine if integrating environmental justice and health concepts into construction education improves students' awareness of how their future work can help or harm community health, particularly in disadvantaged neighborhoods.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Age 14-18 years at enrollment
Current enrollment in a participating construction career pathway program (minimum 2nd semester)
Ability to participate in 6-month curriculum during regular CTE class periods
Written informed consent from parent/guardian for participants under 18 years
Disqualifiers
Prior participation in a formal environmental justice or planetary health curriculum within the past 12 months
Expected inability to complete study assessments due to planned relocation or program withdrawal
Concurrent enrollment in another research study involving educational interventions
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Community-Centered Design Curriculum with EJT
- Traditional Technical Curriculum