Pneumatic Compression vs Blood Flow Restriction for Muscle Recovery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-30
SponsorUniversity of Southern California

About this trial

Both BFR and intermittent pneumatic compression are purported to decrease symptoms associated with exercise induced muscle damage (EIMD) that cause delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Blood flow restriction relies on applying pressurized cuffs to the most proximal portion of the limb. Another form of recovery often relied upon is pneumatic compression. The mechanism by which pneumatic compression works is similar to that of a massage, whereby the device progressively increases the pressure on a portion of the limb before releasing and moving further up the limb.The purpose of this study is determine whether BFR or pneumatic compression can be used to decreased DOMS which may indicate enhanced recovery.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

18-30 years of age

Recreationally active population

Women should be on a form of hormonal contraception.

No current musculoskeletal injuries or pathologies

Disqualifiers

Individuals that routinely train trail running

Discomfort when running

Deep vein thrombosis

Blood clots

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pneumatic Compression
  • Blood Flow Restriction

Treatment groups

33 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups