About this trial
This study examines whether individual differences in how speakers respond to hearing versus physical sensation during speech can predict who benefits most from visual feedback during a speech task. Healthy adults will complete a series of tasks in which auditory feedback is altered in real time through headphones, with and without an added visual display of the speech signal. A computational model will be used to estimate how strongly each participant relies on hearing versus physical sensation when monitoring speech. The study will then test whether this individual profile predicts how much the visual display improves each participant's ability to respond to the altered feedback.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Age 18 to 45 years
Self-reported English as dominant or equally dominant language (learned English by age 3)
No self-reported history of significant speech, language, or hearing difficulty
Pass pure-tone hearing screening at 25 dB HL
Disqualifiers
Learned English after age 3
English is not a dominant language
History of speech or language disorder, hearing loss, or neurodevelopmental disorder (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome)
Failure to pass pure-tone hearing screening
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Altered Auditory Feedback (AAF)
- Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
New York University
Lead sponsor
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
Collaborator