About this trial
Post-operative management of shoulder surgery patients, particularly in terms of pain management and follow-up, can vary from one center to another, influencing clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to compare two approaches to post-operative follow-up in two distinct centers: structured follow-up using the Vivalto-Dom protocol in Paris, and autonomous follow-up through contact with a nurse in Saint-Grégoire. The hypothesis is that these differences in the care pathway will affect pain management, comfort and patient satisfaction. By controlling for operative variability (a single surgeon operating in both centers), the study will identify the most effective follow-up practices for improving post-operative management, with the ultimate aim of optimizing quality of care and reducing post-operative complications.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Patient eligible for one of the following 4 types of surgery: Simple non-repair arthroscopic surgery (acromion, calcification), arthroscopic repair surgery (cuff, DAS, bankart), open surgery without prosthesis (ligamentoplasty, bone block), open surgery with prosthesis (inverted prosthesis, anatomic prosthesis, etc.).
Disqualifiers
Patients with one or more communication disorders.
Pregnant or breast-feeding patients
Patients not covered by a social security scheme
Refusal to participate in research
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Vivalto Dom follow-up
- Liberal follow-up