Prospective Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of EUS vs MRCP for Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

About this trial

MRCP and EUS are diagnostically equivalent in detecting CBD stones among patients with intermediate risk, as shown in a landmark RCT. However, MRI-based imaging is power-intensive, requiring large infrastructure and long scan durations. EUS, a less energy-consuming and portable procedure, has the added advantage of enabling same-session ERCP, reducing the need for repeat procedures.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age ≥18 years

Intermediate likelihood of CBD stone (per ESGE)

Undergoing either MRCP or EUS for evaluation

Disqualifiers

High or low likelihood category (per ESGE)

Undergoing both MRCP and EUS simultaneously

Contraindications to either modality

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Not listed

Trial groups

200 Participants
are grouped into 2 trial groups