Prostaglandins Versus Trans-cervical Balloon for Induction of Labor in Fetal Growth Restriction (PROBIN)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Bordeaux

About this trial

The goal of this randomized trial is to compare two methods of induction in a fetal growth restriction population. The main question it aims to answer is:

• Is trans-cervical balloon superior to prostaglandins in reducing the cesarean section rate, without increasing neonatal morbidity? Participants will have an induction of labour by cervical ripening with trans-cervical balloon in the trans-cervical balloon catheter arm and with Prostaglandins in the Misoprostol arm.

Researchers will compare two methods of induction: trans-cervical balloon and prostaglandins to see if trans-cervical balloon is associated with a lower risk of cesarean delivery.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age over 18 years

Singleton gestation, with cephalic presentation

Gestational age at randomization between entre 34 weeks of gestation and 0 day and 41 weeks of gestation and 0 day

Fetal growth restriction (FGR). FGR is defined at the third trimester by an abdominal circumference below the 10th centile and/or an estimated fetal weight below the 10th centile (according to local curve), according to the trial DIGITAT. Fetus with normal and abnormal Doppler index can be included.

Disqualifiers

Contraindication to an induction of labor

History of previous cesarean delivery, myomectomy by laparotomy or laparoscopy

Contraindication to misoprostol or trans-cervical balloon

Known HIV positivity (because of modified delivery plan)

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Trans-cervical balloon
  • Misoprostol

Treatment groups

774 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Lead sponsor

French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health

Collaborator