Prosthetic Complications in Full-arch Screw-retained Implant Restorations Using Monolithic Zirconia Versus Titanium Frameworks: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-70
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to to compare the prosthetic complication rate and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) between screw-retained monolithic zirconia frameworks and CNC-milled titanium frameworks with zirconia superstructures in completely edentulous patients restored with full-arch implant-supported prostheses over a follow-up period of 12 months.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Aged 18 years or older.

Able to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.

In good general health, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I or II.

Completely edentulous in the arch to be treated (maxilla and/or mandible).

Disqualifiers

Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7.0%).

History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region.

History of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy.

Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised status.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Monolithic Zirconia Prosthesis
  • CNC-milled titanium framework and zirconia superstructure

Treatment groups

12 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators