PUL vs TURP in BPH Patients With Urinary Retention
ConditionBPH With Urinary Obstruction
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexMale
Age40+
SponsorQueen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
About this trial
The study will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing prostatic urethral lift (PUL) versus transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) in benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients with urinary retention. The primary objective of this study is to compare the catheter-free rates of PUL vs TURP. Secondary objectives include comparison of complications rates, cost effectiveness, patient satisfactory, symptom scores, quality of life measures and urodynamic parameters.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Male patients
age >40 years old
urinary retention who failed trial without catheter
Disqualifiers
Inability to provide consent OR no guardians or relatives to help provide consent on patient's behalf
Active urinary tract infection
Previous surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (i.e., TURP, prostatic urethral lift, etc.)
Bladder stones
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Prostatic Urethral Lift
- TURP
Treatment groups
100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov