About this trial
A prospective, multi-center, noninferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy of UI-EWD (Nexpowder™) hemostatic powder versus conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients presenting with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding which is found at endoscopy to be due to one of the following sources: a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel; an esophageal, gastric or duodenal tumor with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; a gastric or duodenal Dieulafoy lesion with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; or an actively bleeding Mallory-Weiss tear.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Adults age 22 years or older
Presentation with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding (hematemesis, melena, and/or hematochezia)
Subject voluntarily agrees to participate in the clinical investigation, provides written informed consent, and will be able to comply with the investigational protocol in the opinion of the site investigator
Cause of bleeding as determined at upper endoscopy is one of the following sources: a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel; an esophageal, gastric or duodenal tumor with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; a gastric or duodenal Dieulafoy lesion with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; or an actively bleeding Mallory-Weiss tear. The definition of "active oozing" will require bleeding to persist for ≥ 3 minutes of endoscopic observation.
Disqualifiers
Incarceration
Subjects that are not able to provide written informed consent
Pregnancy or nursing mothers
Endoscopic hemostatic treatment in the past 30 days
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- UI-EWD
- Conventional therapy
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
Medtronic - MITG
Lead sponsor
North American Science Associates Ltd.
Collaborator