The purpose of this interventional study is to identify which combination of remote monitoring devices (e.g. home spirometry, pulse oximetry, scale, ePROs) is the most feasible (as defined by adherence, retention, and data completeness) and acceptable when used for the detection of clinically significant Interstitial Lung Disease events.
age 18 or older
English or Spanish speaking
have a UCSF diagnosis of one of the major ILD subtypes seen in the ILD Clinic (Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis, Connective-tissue disease related ILD, Sarcoidosis, Familial Fibrosis). Languages are limited to those for which both device instructional materials and user support are available (written and video). The ILD diagnosis will be based on multidisciplinary conference review, which is the diagnostic gold standard. We have restricted the ILD subtypes to those for which there is efficacy data for RPM or comparable clinical trajectories, and subtypes that account for >10% of the ILD diagnoses seen at UCSF.
Patients who are unable provide informed consent for any reason or are acutely ill.
University of California, San Francisco
Lead sponsor
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Collaborator
patientMpower Ltd.
Collaborator