Restrictive vs Liberal Intraoperative Fluid Strategy and Postoperative Outcomes After Elective Cesarean Section

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-45
SponsorNigde Omer Halisdemir University

About this trial

Spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section is frequently associated with hemodynamic instability and postoperative complications such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and delayed gastrointestinal recovery. Although intraoperative fluid administration is routinely used to prevent spinal-induced hypotension, the optimal fluid strategy remains unclear. Both restrictive and liberal fluid approaches may influence maternal hemodynamics and postoperative outcomes through different physiological mechanisms.

This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial aims to compare restrictive (≤3 mL/kg/h) and liberal (\>3 mL/kg/h) intraoperative crystalloid fluid strategies in patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome is the incidence of PONV within the first 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include postdural puncture headache (PDPH), time to first flatus, hypotension frequency, and vasopressor requirements.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Female patients aged 18-45 years

ASA physical status II

Scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

Provision of written informed consent

Disqualifiers

Emergency cesarean section

Preeclampsia or eclampsia

Known cardiac failure

Known renal failure

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Restrictive intraoperative crystalloid fluid strategy (≤3 mL/kg/h)
  • Liberal intraoperative crystalloid fluid strategy (>3 mL/kg/h)

Treatment groups

160 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups