Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorSohag University
About this trial
The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by:
* Puncture success rate * Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Adults : Both male and female participants.
Planned intervention with retrograde access: Candidates for endovascular interventions, including angioplasty, stent deployment
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Road-map guided versus US guided retrograde access
Treatment groups
32 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov